<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>the corioblog &#187; army</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coriolinus.net/category/life/army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coriolinus.net</link>
	<description>read, and be entertained</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 19:53:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FW: Wikileaks data on Gov&#8217;t Computers &amp; Personal Owned</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/12/09/fw-wikileaks-data-on-govt-computers-personal-owned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/12/09/fw-wikileaks-data-on-govt-computers-personal-owned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what i learned at work today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classified information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer network security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee-owned information systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information sensitivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=3148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Received the following email regarding the official Army policy on Wikileaks, at least for my unit: From: [redacted] Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:03 PM To: 2-2 AVN Staff; 2-2 ASLT COs; 2-2 ASLT 1SGs Subject: FW: Wikileaks data on Gov&#8217;t Computers &#38; Personal Owned Computers (UNCLASSIFIED) Importance: High ALCON, Below is the guidance for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Received the following email regarding the official Army policy on Wikileaks, at least for my unit:</p>
<blockquote><p>From: [redacted]<br />
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:03 PM<br />
To: 2-2 AVN Staff; 2-2 ASLT COs; 2-2 ASLT 1SGs<br />
Subject: FW: Wikileaks data on Gov&#8217;t Computers &amp; Personal Owned<br />
Computers (UNCLASSIFIED)<br />
Importance: High</p>
<p>ALCON,</p>
<p>Below is the guidance for viewing material on Wikileaks&#8217; website.  To<br />
summarize the below, the Wikileaks website is not to be viewed on a<br />
Government computer, the information is still considered to be<br />
classified and any computer found containing classified information<br />
(i.e. information from Wikileaks) will confiscated and subsequently<br />
wiped.</p>
<p>If there are any questions please contact the S2 office.</p>
<p>v/r</p>
<p>[redacted]<br />
CPT, MI<br />
2-2 AASLT BN S2</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;Original Message&#8212;&#8211;<br />
From: [redacted]<br />
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:05 AM<br />
To: [redacted]<br />
Subject: Wikileaks data on Gov&#8217;t Computers &amp; Personal Owned Computers<br />
(UNCLASSIFIED)<br />
Importance: High</p>
<p>BLUF: Do not view released or published classified data found on the<br />
internet (Open Source) on unclassified Government systems OR on personal<br />
owed systems. (See caveats)</p>
<p>Department of the Army policies regarding the issue can be found in AR<br />
380-5 Information Security and AR 25-2 Information Assurance. All of the<br />
information is still considered classified. Although now that it can be<br />
found via open source, DOD still considers it as classified until<br />
further notice and should not be viewed or process on a designated<br />
unclassified government computer. Should a unclassified computer be<br />
found containing classified information, it will need to be isolated and<br />
wiped to remove the information.</p>
<p>As for viewing the information via personal computer, I have not seen<br />
any official message traffic preventing military personnel from viewing<br />
the information; however should a personal laptop be found with<br />
classified information on it, it will be confiscated with the potential<br />
for a 15-6 investigation based on the information on an unapproved<br />
system and improper storage.</p>
<p>AR 380-5, Chapter 10-2 a.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>AR 25-2</p>
<p>4-31. Employee-owned information systems a. Prohibit the use of<br />
employee-owned information systems (EOISs) for classified or sensitive<br />
information.</p>
<p>AR 25-2 Chapter 3-3</p>
<p>c. General users. Use of Government IS and access to Government networks<br />
is a revocable privilege, not a right.</p>
<p>Users are the foundation of the DiD strategy and their actions affect<br />
the most vulnerable portion of the AEI. Users must have a favorable<br />
background investigation or hold a security clearance and access<br />
approvals commensurate with the level of information processed or<br />
available on the system. Users will-</p>
<p>(1) Comply with the command&#8217;s AUP for Government owned ISs and sign an<br />
AUP prior to or upon account activation.</p>
<p>(2) Complete initial and/or annual IA training as defined in the IA<br />
training BBP (<a href="https://informationassurance.us.army.mil/" target="_blank">https://informationassurance.us.army.mil</a><br />
&lt;<a href="https://informationassurance.us.army.mil/" target="_blank">https://informationassurance.us.army.mil/</a>&gt; ).</p>
<p>(3) Mark and safeguard files, output products, and storage media per the<br />
classification level and disseminate them only to individuals authorized<br />
to receive them with a valid need to know.</p>
<p>(4) Protect ISs and IS peripherals located in their respective areas in<br />
accordance with physical security and data protection requirements.</p>
<p>(5) Practice safe network and Internet operating principles and take no<br />
actions that threaten the integrity of the system or network.</p>
<p>(6) Obtain prior approval for the use of any media (for example, USB,<br />
CD-ROM, floppy disk) from the SA/ IAM.</p>
<p>(7) Scan all files, attachments, and media with an approved and<br />
installed AV product before opening a file or attachment or introducing<br />
media into the IS.</p>
<p>(8) Report all known or suspected spam, chain letters, and violations of<br />
acceptable use to the SA, IAM, or IASO.</p>
<p>(9) Immediately stop using an infected IS; and report suspicious,<br />
erratic, or anomalous IS operations, and missing or added files,<br />
services, or programs to the SA/IASO in accordance with local policy.</p>
<p>(10) Not disclose their individual account password or pass-phrase<br />
authenticators.</p>
<p>(11) Invoke password-protected screen locks on your workstation after<br />
not more than 15 minutes of non-use or inactivity.</p>
<p>(12) Logoff ISs at the end of each workday.</p>
<p>(13) Access only that data, control information, software, hardware, and<br />
firmware for which the user is authorized access.</p>
<p>(14) Access only that data that they are authorized or have a need to<br />
know.</p>
<p>Should someone have additional information regarding this issue please<br />
send to me so I can review and disseminate.</p>
<p>V/r,</p>
<p>CPT [redacted]<br />
BDE S2, 2 CAB, 2 ID</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve redacted the names in the emails; what matters is that they came from the BDE and BN S2. For those of you not in the Army, the S2 is the information security office; the bit of each unit in charge of classification, and the officer who signs as S2 is the person in charge of information security for that unit.</p>
<p>The policy they lay out here actually seems pretty sane to me: even though they&#8217;re threatening confiscation and erasure of personal computers discovered to have classified data on them, it&#8217;s not like they&#8217;re proposing to audit everyone&#8217;s individual PC; they&#8217;re just reiterating already extant policy. As it stands, on your own time and internet you&#8217;re perfectly free to look at this; just turn on porn mode and prevent your browser from caching anything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/12/09/fw-wikileaks-data-on-govt-computers-personal-owned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Sound of Cannon</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/11/10/the-sound-of-cannon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/11/10/the-sound-of-cannon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what i learned at work today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=3133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those of you who follow me on twitter know that I recently described tank fire as making a crumping sound. Recently I had the opportunity to learn otherwise. Tank fire sounds like a bass drum the size of a stadium. It is louder than thunder. A kilometer away from the firing, it rattled the walls [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those of you who follow me on twitter know that I recently described tank fire as making a crumping sound. Recently I had the opportunity to learn otherwise.</p>
<p>Tank fire sounds like a bass drum the size of a stadium. It is louder than thunder. A kilometer away from the firing, it rattled the walls of a building strongly enough that I felt the pressure wave passing while inside. It is the boom of the hammer of the gods pounding out a new mountain range.</p>
<p>Tank fire is loud enough that I could hear it inside a Black Hawk in flight, at least 3k away, over the noise of the engines and through the two layers of ear protection that are mandatory for flight crew.</p>
<p>None of this is exaggeration. I was deeply impressed by the sound of cannon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/11/10/the-sound-of-cannon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Level Up!</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/06/21/level-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/06/21/level-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 03:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2-2 ASLT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=3090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paradox of excellence is that for doing good work, your reward is more work to do. Actually, it&#8217;s not much of a paradox unless you assume that a fundamental goal at work is to earn the most pay for the least amount of trouble, which seems a very reasonable goal. It&#8217;s not quite the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The paradox of excellence is that for doing good work, your reward is more work to do. Actually, it&#8217;s not much of a paradox unless you assume that a fundamental goal at work is to earn the most pay for the least amount of trouble, which seems a very reasonable goal. It&#8217;s not quite the same as least effort: something fun can be quite challenging, but no trouble at all. Still, even given that goal, the pattern at work is something like this: dive into the fun stuff with gusto. Do a good if uninspired job on the troublesome stuff. Then get given more responsibilities.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what happens to me at least. I got a call from the CO CDR last night saying that the BN CDR wanted to meet both of us this morning to talk about additional duties. At the meeting, he told me that based on the recommendations of the senior warrants in the battalion, he was tasking me to be the BN Flight Operations officer.</p>
<p>BN Flight Operations is a full-time job. To accomplish this, I&#8217;m being pulled out of Charlie Company and moved into HHC: I&#8217;m a staff aviator now. I get my own office, immunity from most random details, and I drop every additional duty except my other BN one: Flight Records. Keeping even one is unusual, and that particular one more so: for years, those jobs have been split to keep the workload manageable. I get to buck that trend. This doesn&#8217;t exactly help me build up my flight hours or earn my PC orders, but it can&#8217;t hurt my career to have on my OER that I was picked by name to do both these critical BN jobs while still junior.</p>
<p>The job itself is a bit of a cipher to me: I&#8217;ve never yet touched the Operations side of things. Scuttlebutt has it as complex, data-heavy, and requiring flexible work hours: perfect, in other words, for me. Hopefully the match works as well in reality as it does on paper.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not completely unambivalent about this: it means even more delay until I get my PC orders, a lightened flight schedule even once I have them, and a lot of work in the meantime. It means that even when I earn my callsign, it won&#8217;t start with Comanche, but Wild Card. I regret both of those things. Still, the regret is minor compared to the excitement. This seems like it could be a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/06/21/level-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change of Command Video</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/05/27/change-of-command-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/05/27/change-of-command-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 09:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2-2 ASLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what i learned at work today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abbreviations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient video device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camcorder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment/Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-linear editing system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videotape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=3066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the beginning of this month, I got a task: I was to produce a comedic video short, 10-15 minutes long, celebrating the tenure of the BN Commander, to be shown at his outbound Hail and Farewell dinner. One of my peers would back me up, and I&#8217;d have command support for getting the filming [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the beginning of this month, I got a task: I was to produce a comedic video short, 10-15 minutes long, celebrating the tenure of the BN Commander, to be shown at his outbound Hail and Farewell dinner. One of my peers would back me up, and I&#8217;d have command support for getting the filming done, but this was to be my project. I&#8217;m still not sure who decided I&#8217;d get the job or why, but I&#8217;ve been working diligently on it. I&#8217;ll probably put it on youtube when it&#8217;s done, which&#8217;ll be next week at the latest. </p>
<p>Working on this has been an education. I&#8217;ve written before, but only short fiction and nonfiction, not comedy scripts. I&#8217;ve shot video before, but only in webcam/home movie contexts. I&#8217;ve never even attempted to edit video before. All I bring to the table is an active mind, a powerful computer, and a borrowed camcorder that was on the low end of the scale a decade ago.</p>
<p>Actually, those may well turn out to be sufficient. The basic plan was to take five times as much footage as would end up in the final cut, and spend five times as much time editing as filming; so far that&#8217;s proving an effective strategy. Still, I can&#8217;t help but sense that unless I pull several more all-nighters working on it, this thing isn&#8217;t going to be good enough.</p>
<p>As for what I learned today in particular, there are two major points. The first is that even though this ancient video device claims to have native support in Windows 7, it simply doesn&#8217;t appear when plugged in. It&#8217;s a good thing I have a spare old XP box lying around, or the editing process would be even more painful. Also, while transcribing these digital video cassettes is at least easier than working with analog, they still have a major drawback in comparison to solid-state storage: they only transfer their bits at 1x speed, meaning that every hour of video takes an hour to transcribe before I can begin editing. It&#8217;s an anomaly in a world in which everything else digital happens at some high multiple of realtime. </p>
<p>If only I got paid overtime, I could double my salary. At least I can probably show the Army that they&#8217;ve got a bargain in me.</p>
<p>[edit 20100531:2152]</p>
<p>Ok, so the actual numbers worked out like this: 2 hours filming to produce 1 hour film. 15 hours of editing later, I managed to complete this 8 minute <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0xhQ5LyK9M">first draft</a>. Submitted it to the XO for review, and he said that with this quality, the maximum length should be 5 minutes. So: this draft is guaranteed to contain rare material not contained in the final release! I&#8217;ll put the final version up when it&#8217;s done; the challenge is to use the cutting to improve the overall quality.</p>
<p>[edit 20100531:2250]</p>
<p>Oh yes: I don&#8217;t expect this to be comprehensible, let alone amusing, to anyone who isn&#8217;t already familiar with the outgoing commander of 2-2 ASLT. 90% of this is in-jokes.</p>
<p>[edit 20100601:0437]</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shsYorsdK0c">Final cut</a>. If it&#8217;s not down to five minutes exactly, it&#8217;s at least less than six; it would have been very difficult to remove much else without gutting it. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/05/27/change-of-command-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Apache Video</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/04/06/the-apache-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/04/06/the-apache-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 03:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apache Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[official spokesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomson Reuters Group Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UH-60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War/Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wide Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=3038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Preface: I am neither an official Pentagon source nor an official spokesman for the Army. I am a US Army UH-60 pilot otherwise entirely dissociated from this event; these are my personal opinions.) A video was posted recently by WikiLeaks. It&#8217;s gun camera footage from an Apache engagement on 12 July 2007. The video begins [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Preface: I am neither an official Pentagon source nor an official spokesman for the Army. I am a US Army UH-60 pilot otherwise entirely dissociated from this event; these are my personal opinions.)</p>
<p>A video was posted recently by WikiLeaks. It&#8217;s gun camera footage from an Apache engagement on 12 July 2007. </p>
<p><object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/is9sxRfU-ik&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/is9sxRfU-ik&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0xb1b1b1&#038;color2=0xcfcfcf&#038;hl=en_GB&#038;feature=player_embedded&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>The video begins with ground forces requesting support from Crazyhorse, the Apache flight. They mention a group of people, one of whom has a weapon.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/1-man-with-ak.jpg"><img src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/1-man-with-ak.jpg" alt="" title="Man with AK" width="640" height="400" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3039" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/2-ak-hilighted.jpg"><img src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/2-ak-hilighted.jpg" alt="" title="AK hilighted" width="378" height="286" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3040" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to see, because we&#8217;re looking at a low-resolution version of a low-resolution video looking at a distant target, but the guy does appear to be carrying an AK. It looks like the Apache&#8217;s found the group that the ground forces were talking about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/3-hes-got-a-weapon-too.jpg"><img src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/3-hes-got-a-weapon-too.jpg" alt="" title="He&#039;s got a weapon too" width="640" height="400" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3042" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/4-weapon-hilighted.jpg"><img src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/4-weapon-hilighted.jpg" alt="" title="Weapon hilighted" width="152" height="288" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3043" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/5-another-man-with-weapon.jpg"><img src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/5-another-man-with-weapon.jpg" alt="" title="Another man with weapon" width="640" height="400" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3044" /></a><br />
<a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/6-other-weapon-hilighted.jpg"><img src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/6-other-weapon-hilighted.jpg" alt="" title="Other weapon hilighted" width="245" height="321" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3045" /></a></p>
<p>After identifying further members of the group, the Apaches requested and received permission to engage. Only after receiving permission did they first fire weapons. Once they had downed all targets, they stopped firing. They did not fire on the wounded. When a van arrived to evacuate the targets, they requested and received permission to engage. Only then did they disable the van. </p>
<p>Wikileaks is consistently referring to these men as &#8216;civilians.&#8217; They may not have been uniformed military personnel, but they were definitely combatants; they may not have been currently actively engaged in a firefight, but there had been small arms fire from that area since before dawn that day. The mission of both the Apache element and the ground forces was to eliminate any insurgents and/or weapons caches from the area. </p>
<p>After the fact, it was discovered that two of the people killed were in fact Reuters employees, and that in the van were two children injured by the attack. Coverage of the video has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/world/middleeast/06baghdad.html?hp">focused on this</a>. It&#8217;s tragic, but the newspeople were in the company of armed insurgents and appeared to be part of that group. As for the children, they were simply not detectable from the Apache. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s worth looking at the <a href="http://www2.centcom.mil/sites/foia/rr/CENTCOM Regulation CCR 25210/Death of Reuters Journalists/6--2nd Brigade Combat Team 15-6 Investigation.pdf">official report</a>. (<a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/6--2nd%20Brigade%20Combat%20Team%2015-6%20Investigation.pdf">Local Cache</a>) The results findings begin on page 11 of the PDF. The report contains necessary background information, such as the fact that the infantry less than 200 yards away had been receiving small-arms fire all morning. </p>
<p>There are plenty of people out there calling this a <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/04/the-lies-of-the-pentagon.html">war crime</a>, <a href="http://www.collateralmurder.com/">murder</a>, and worse. That is simply not the case. There are people out there who recognize this (<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/06/AR2010040601368_5.html?hpid=topnews&#038;sid=ST2010040601423">1</a>, <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/04/fog_war">2</a>, <a href="http://gawker.com/5510094/wikileaks-video-demonstrates-conclusively-that-innocent-people-get-killed-in-wars">3</a>), but they are too few. </p>
<p>War is a terrible thing, but this was not a crime. This was professional pilots reacting appropriately to a hostile situation. I feel sympathy for the noncombatants in the group, but they brought it upon themselves. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/04/06/the-apache-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixed Wing Multi Engine Qualification Course</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/04/06/fixed-wing-multi-engine-qualification-course/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/04/06/fixed-wing-multi-engine-qualification-course/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 14:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aeronautics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branch manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fixed-wing aircraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=3036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dropped off a packet today to apply to the FWMEQC. Fixed wing transitions used to be a perk available to old crusty warrant officers with over 20 years of service. Recently, someone high up decided that it&#8217;d be good to have some younger fixed-wing pilots as well. I have to admit, I&#8217;m kind of excited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dropped off a packet today to apply to the FWMEQC. Fixed wing transitions used to be a perk available to old crusty warrant officers with over 20 years of service. Recently, someone high up decided that it&#8217;d be good to have some younger fixed-wing pilots as well. I have to admit, I&#8217;m kind of excited about this.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t estimate right now my chances of actually getting that transition. Right now, it seems like the BN CDR is opposed to the notion of junior warrants transitioning straight from flight school to Korea to the FWMEQC without ever having actually deployed. However, that&#8217;s exactly the profile which the branch manager said they were looking for for these applications. I expect the BN CDR to recommend disapproval of the application; what I don&#8217;t know is whether that decision will be automatically upheld by the selection panel.</p>
<p>For me, the application is a pure win situation. If I don&#8217;t get in, I lose nothing. If I do get the transition and then move to a fixed-wing unit, I get qualified and experienced in a mode of flight it&#8217;d be very expensive to pay for on my own. If I get the transition but then get sent to another Black Hawk unit on its way to deployment, I still haven&#8217;t lost anything; it&#8217;s not that I dislike rotary-wing flight. I just take the expensive qualification and don&#8217;t get experienced at it.</p>
<p>There is one drawback: if I do get selected for the qualification course, it&#8217;ll add another year to my ADSO. I think I can live with that. Really, all the Army needs to do to keep me around for a career is keep giving me expensive and cool training in exchange for a year or two of extension at a time. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/04/06/fixed-wing-multi-engine-qualification-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professional Development Day</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/02/25/professional-development-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/02/25/professional-development-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2-2 ASLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hawk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Person Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warrant Officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WOAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s that time of year again: the entire BN took the day off to attend mandatory seminars. Until lunch, it was the familiar parade of lectures that boil down to &#8220;It is better for you personally and for the Army if you are not a drunken boor.&#8221; After lunch, we had an interesting tour of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s that time of year again: the entire <acronym title="Battalion">BN</acronym> took the day off to attend mandatory seminars. Until lunch, it was the familiar parade of lectures that boil down to &#8220;It is better for you personally and for the Army if you are not a drunken boor.&#8221; After lunch, we had an interesting tour of the intermediate maintenance facilities at Cp. Humphreys, and closed the day with an excellent talk by the Branch Managers.</p>
<p>Branch Managers are the people in charge of moving people around within the Army, to meet both the Army&#8217;s needs and the needs of the individuals which it is comprised of. The two in charge of all Warrant Officer Black Hawk pilots had come to Korea for the express purpose of educating us as to the exact process by which they decide where we go and which schools we attend.</p>
<p>This held news both good and bad for me. Good news: coming to Korea immediately after flight school was a very good thing career-wise; my peers elsewhere are often not even <acronym title="Readiness Level 1. Required to participate in unit missions as a pilot.">RL1</acronym> at this point, let alone approaching their <acronym title="Pilot in Command. The pilot bearing overall responsibility for any given mission.">PC</acronym> <acronym title="The process by which an aviator gains a new qualification.">checkride</acronym>. Bad news: unless I get my PC qualification quickly and spend the rest of my tour here awing people with my prowess, I&#8217;m unlikely to get the <acronym title="Instructor Pilot. These are the people who designate a person's RL number, and are the only PCs allowed to fly with people whose RL number is not 1.">IP</acronym> course enroute. Good news: I&#8217;ve got an excellent chance of being assigned to Germany immediately after leaving Korea. Bad news: I&#8217;m unlikely to ever be stationed in Japan unless I stay in the Army substantially longer than I want to stay. Good news: I&#8217;m fairly likely to be sent to <acronym title="Warrant Officer Advanced Course. Part of WO professional military education; increases promotion chances to CW3.">WOAC</acronym> enroute. </p>
<p>The day would have been substantially improved if we could have simply skipped the morning sessions, or at least split the day in two. This morning&#8217;s showtime was 0515, and we didn&#8217;t get back to K-16 until 1910. Still, I can&#8217;t say that it was entirely a waste; the talk by the Branch Managers was well worth attending. As for the morning, if nothing else, I took away a page full of notes about how not to give a speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2010/02/25/professional-development-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>this is the field</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/24/this-is-the-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/24/this-is-the-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2-2 ASLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2925" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000297.2048x1536.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-2925" title="Ground Crew" src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000297.2048x1536-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="768" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The ground crew showed up a day early and left a day late with all the gear.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2924" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000295.2048x1536.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-2924" title="camoflauge" src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000295.2048x1536-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="768" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Our stealth camoflauge was perfect.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2923" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000283.2048x1363.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-2923" title="incoming" src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000283.2048x1363-1024x681.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="681" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Eventually, the flight crews showed up.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2926" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000298.2048x1536.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-2926" title="ramp" src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000298.2048x1536-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="768" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This is the point of the exercise: to prove that we can operate our helicopters in the field.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2922" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 1034px"><a href="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000303.2048x1363.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-2922" title="departure" src="http://www.coriolinus.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P1000303.2048x1363-1024x681.jpg" alt="" width="1024" height="681" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">This is the payoff: an air assault operation with live troops.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/24/this-is-the-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Things they didn&#8217;t cover in the Armorer&#8217;s course</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/05/things-they-didnt-cover-in-the-armorers-course/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/05/things-they-didnt-cover-in-the-armorers-course/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2-2 ASLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locksmithing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water transport infrastructure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes the high-security lock is so high security that it won&#8217;t open, or close, or release the key, until you get in and bang on it with a sledgehammer a few times. Once that&#8217;s done, though, it turns with a sweet, oily smoothness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the high-security lock is so high security that it won&#8217;t open, or close, or release the key, until you get in and bang on it with a sledgehammer a few times. Once that&#8217;s done, though, it turns with a sweet, oily smoothness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/05/things-they-didnt-cover-in-the-armorers-course/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snow Day</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/05/snow-day-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/05/snow-day-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2-2 ASLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Precipitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weather]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The army&#8217;s schedule accommodates no man. It doesn&#8217;t matter that I signed in from leave three days ago or that I&#8217;ve been living from a duffel since the beginning of October. Today there was a mission! An important, long-planned mission which, since I&#8217;d been gone for the duration of the planning, basically required me to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The army&#8217;s schedule accommodates no man. It doesn&#8217;t matter that I signed in from leave three days ago or that I&#8217;ve been living from a duffel since the beginning of October. Today there was a mission! An important, long-planned mission which, since I&#8217;d been gone for the duration of the planning, basically required me to attend but gave me no role to fill. So they made one!</p>
<p>My role: open the Arms Room at 4am for the ground convoy.</p>
<p>So at 0350 this morning, I was on my way to the company building through the freezing rain, seemingly the only human awake within miles.</p>
<p>The weather&#8217;s been moody all week. It&#8217;s mostly been a frustrating kind of fog: breathtakingly atmospheric, kind of warm and comfortable, but absolutely impossible to photograph. No matter how you set the camera, the picture looks like it&#8217;s underexposed and out of focus. This morning, though, it just seemed vicious. This was the kind of weather that in a more mountainous country would demand Frankensteinian mood lightning.</p>
<p>As the morning wore on, things seemed to get better. Things stayed cold, but by sunrise, there was no more rain. The whole battalion was churning with pre-mission preparations. The ground convoy eventually set out to set up the ATC site and the tents. The flight crews ran up the aircraft to make sure everything was working. Half of ours turned out to have broken deicing gear, but that only meant that they couldn&#8217;t fly into observed icing conditions. We joked about the weather report: winds gusting from 30-44 knots. It&#8217;s only a joke when you know that Black Hawks are prohibited from running up or shutting down the main rotor in winds at or greater than 45 knots. Half an hour before planned takeoff, the aircraft were loaded and set. The crews gathered for a final brief.</p>
<p>That brief never happened. Outside, the first flakes of the first snow of the year were drifting from the sky.</p>
<p>For the next four hours, the situation didn&#8217;t change. We all watched movies, or watched each other, or watched the weather. The snow skirled and danced in the wind, enthusiastic in its role as winter&#8217;s leading element. Every half an hour, someone called the weather station to get an update on its predictions. They never reported a change. Every once in a while, someone called the ground convoy to see what conditions were at the destination. The only change there was the steadily increasing depth of the snow.</p>
<p>We made pilot jokes. &#8220;Check this out: Osan&#8217;s reporting &#8216;unknown precipitation.&#8217;&#8221; &#8220;What do they have, meteors?&#8221; We waited.</p>
<p>Eventually, the commander called everyone in. Despite the BN CDR&#8217;s enthusiasm to get out into the field, it wasn&#8217;t going to happen today. Everyone go home, get some rest. Be back at work at 6am tomorrow. New takeoff time is 9.</p>
<p>So we put the sensitive items away and all walked home, in the bright blue sky and the quickly vanishing snow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/05/snow-day-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

