<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ideal Language and the Possibility of Deceit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/</link>
	<description>read, and be entertained</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:31:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: coriolinus</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/comment-page-1/#comment-37523</link>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2909#comment-37523</guid>
		<description>I can think of a way; it&#039;d just be impractically expensive. It runs like this: set up two identical Truman Show towns. Give a convincing reason why people can never leave: &quot;you&#039;re a mars colony&quot; or something. In both, all adults are actors, not part of the test set. In one, the only spoken language is English. In the other, the only spoken or written language is Lojban. Wait 25 years or so, then test the logical capability of both populations of youngsters. 

Even if only for the Truman Show footage it generates it&#039;d be a fun experiment to be a part of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can think of a way; it&#8217;d just be impractically expensive. It runs like this: set up two identical Truman Show towns. Give a convincing reason why people can never leave: &#8220;you&#8217;re a mars colony&#8221; or something. In both, all adults are actors, not part of the test set. In one, the only spoken language is English. In the other, the only spoken or written language is Lojban. Wait 25 years or so, then test the logical capability of both populations of youngsters. </p>
<p>Even if only for the Truman Show footage it generates it&#8217;d be a fun experiment to be a part of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explodicle</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/comment-page-1/#comment-37450</link>
		<dc:creator>Explodicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2909#comment-37450</guid>
		<description>Not to the best of my knowlege, no. I don&#039;t even know how such a thing could be measured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to the best of my knowlege, no. I don&#8217;t even know how such a thing could be measured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/comment-page-1/#comment-37449</link>
		<dc:creator>Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2909#comment-37449</guid>
		<description>I think free will is basic to being human, including the will do communicate what we want in language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think free will is basic to being human, including the will do communicate what we want in language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coriolinus</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/comment-page-1/#comment-37446</link>
		<dc:creator>coriolinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2909#comment-37446</guid>
		<description>Lojban seems interesting. I love the notion that translation, at least from it to a natural language, is a compiler problem! 

I can&#039;t seem to find any empirical results from the experiment which birthed Loglan as a side effect. Do you know of any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lojban seems interesting. I love the notion that translation, at least from it to a natural language, is a compiler problem! </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to find any empirical results from the experiment which birthed Loglan as a side effect. Do you know of any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explodicle</title>
		<link>http://www.coriolinus.net/2009/12/16/ideal-language-and-the-possibility-of-deceit/comment-page-1/#comment-37430</link>
		<dc:creator>Explodicle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coriolinus.net/?p=2909#comment-37430</guid>
		<description>It sounds like he&#039;d be a fan of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loglan&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Loglan&lt;/a&gt; (and its successor &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lojban&lt;/a&gt;). Loglan was invented in 1955 as part of an experiment to see if people would actually think more logically if they had to phrase their wording in a logical language. 

I think whether or not this is ideal depends on the situation. As an engineer, rationalist, and terrible liar, I would prefer to convey most of my ideas this way. But there are plenty of cases (theater, poetry, etc) where you&#039;re certainly correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like he&#8217;d be a fan of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loglan" rel="nofollow">Loglan</a> (and its successor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lojban" rel="nofollow">Lojban</a>). Loglan was invented in 1955 as part of an experiment to see if people would actually think more logically if they had to phrase their wording in a logical language. </p>
<p>I think whether or not this is ideal depends on the situation. As an engineer, rationalist, and terrible liar, I would prefer to convey most of my ideas this way. But there are plenty of cases (theater, poetry, etc) where you&#8217;re certainly correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

